OPTIMISED STRATEGY · NQ FUTURES

The optimised ICT power of three for NQ

We took the textbook ICT power of three and found where its trades lost from 23 October 2024 to 24 February 2026. We changed 3 things for a reason each and tuned them on those 16 months only. Then we ran it once on the next 8 months, which nobody had looked at. It made $1,809 on one micro contract there. The textbook made $1,168.

Get the script free Fit it to my account
  • The full Pine script with a free account
  • Every change, why we made it and what it did
  • Re-tune its settings on your market in the Optimiser
ICT power of three · optimised against the textbookMNQ1! · 5-minute · 23 October 2024 → 22 October 2026
8 locked months
+$1,809
Trades there
47
Profit factor there
1.53
Worst drawdown in 2 years
−$1,622
Optimised in the 8 locked months+$1,809
Textbook in the same months+$1,168
Oct 2024Feb 2026Oct 2026

The $50,000 account after each trade. Every trade is one micro contract with $2.50 a contract each side and a tick of slippage. Shaded: the 8 months nobody looked at.

  • Checked 7 November 2026
  • CME data, 23 October 2024 → 22 October 2026 · 517 sessions
  • One micro contract with $2.50 a contract each side and a tick of slippage
  • Tuned on 23 October 2024 → 24 February 2026
  • Locked: 24 February 2026 → 22 October 2026

What the textbook's trades showed

The textbook ICT power of three: the Asia range (20:00 to midnight New York), then a London sweep of one side of it (02:00 to 05:00). At 9:30 it trades the other way, with the stop a tick past the night's extreme and the target at the far side of the Asia range. It is flat by 15:55 and trades once a day.

  • Stops too close lost: when 9:30 was within 0.1 of a day's average range of the night's extreme, 49 trades won 8% and lost $1,157. Price was still pushing through the swept side. The London move had not turned yet.
  • Stops too far lost too: 31 trades with the stop 0.3 of a day's range or more away won 68% and still lost $1,732. The Asia target sits close. One stop-out wiped out several wins.
  • Wide Asia ranges lost: when the night's range was 0.4 of a day's range or more, 17 trades lost $1,854 (profit factor 0.32). Under 0.2, 96 trades made $2,351.
  • On the same trades the Asia-range target beat 0.75R, 1R, 1.5R, 2R and a stop moved to entry. The target stayed the textbook's.

We kept 3 changes for a reason each

Every change we tried, in the order we tried it. Each one was judged on the first 16 months only.

  1. Skip stops that sit too closeKept

    Why: Trades whose stop was within 0.1 of a day's range won 8% (49 trades, −$1,157).

    What it did: Kept at 0.05 of a day's range. A cut at 0.1 scored higher on the 16 months but only at that exact value. One step either way it fell apart. That ruled it out.

  2. Skip stops that sit too farKept

    Why: Stops 0.3 of a day's range or more away won often and lost overall (31 trades, −$1,732).

    What it did: No trade when the stop is more than 0.4 of a day's range away.

  3. Skip wide Asia rangesKept

    Why: A night range of 0.4 of a day's range or more lost $1,854 over 17 trades.

    What it did: No trade when the Asia range is wider than 0.3 of a day's range.

  4. Longs only below the midnight open and shorts only above itLeft out

    Why: ICT's premium and discount rule: buy cheap, sell dear relative to midnight.

    What it did: It did not improve the 16 months once the stop filters were in. We left it out.

The settings it runs with: the textbook's Asia range, London sweep and 9:30 entry; the target the far side of the Asia range; no trade with the stop closer than 0.05 or wider than 0.4 of the daily average range; no trade when the Asia range is wider than 0.3 of it.

The 8 months it never saw

We ran it once on 24 February 2026 → 22 October 2026, after every setting was fixed. To be published it had to make money there with a profit factor of 1.1 or more and beat the textbook.

PeriodVersionNetWorst drawdownProfit factorTradesWon
First 16 months (tuned on)Textbook−$84−$2,8770.9918345.4%
Optimised+$2,414−$1,6221.3611851.7%
8 locked months (never seen)Textbook+$1,168−$2,2681.1210642.5%
Optimised+$1,809−$8131.534755.3%
Both togetherTextbook+$1,084−$3,2361.0528944.3%
Optimised+$4,222−$1,6221.4216552.7%

What to know before you use it

  • It trades rarely: 47 trades in the 8 locked months against the textbook's 106. That is thin evidence.
  • Most of the locked months' profit came in one month: $1,484 of the $1,809 in September 2026. The other seven made $325 between them.
  • The textbook made money in those months too (+$1,168). The optimised version made more with a smaller drawdown ($813 against $2,268).
On the S&P (MES), where nothing was tuned, the textbook lost $2,151 and the optimised version lost $1,610 over the same 8 months. Treat it as an NQ strategy.
The full script: 106 lines of Pine v6Free with an account: no card. You come straight back here with the script open.

Two ways to use it

The script is free. This version is tuned on MNQ 5-minute over our 16 months. Your market, timeframe and months may want different settings.

Free

Our version

  • The script as we tested it: MNQ 5-minute and one micro contract
  • Its settings tuned on our 16 months
  • Its result on the 8 months it never saw
Pro

Fitted to yours

  • The Optimiser re-tunes its settings on the market, timeframe and months you pick
  • It checks the best settings against random tries and on months they never saw
  • Run it on NQ, ES, gold, crude and our other futures

$99.99 a month. A new account gets 3 months for $99.99 in its first 72 hours. Not worth it? Full refund within 30 days.

Questions

Does the ICT power of three work on NQ?

The textbook version lost $84 in the first 16 months and made $1,168 in the 8 months after. Optimised on the first 16 months only, it made $2,414 there and made $1,809 in the 8 months it never saw. That was 47 trades with a profit factor of 1.53 from 24 February 2026 to 22 October 2026.

What does optimised mean here?

It means worked on, not picked from thousands of runs. We read the textbook's trades for where they lost and made each change for a reason. We tuned the settings together on the first 16 months only and kept only settings that made money in all four 4-month stretches with every neighbouring setting holding up too. Then one run on the 8 months nobody had looked at decided whether it was published.

Which data and costs were used?

CME's minutes for the continuous MNQ contract built into 5-minute candles, from 23 October 2024 to 22 October 2026 (517 sessions). Every trade is one micro contract with $2.50 a contract each side and a tick of slippage.

Can I fit it to my own account?

Yes. Fit it to my account opens the Alpha Charts terminal with the script on MNQ 5-minute and the Optimiser on it: it re-tunes the script's settings on the market, timeframe and months you pick, and checks the winner against random tries and months it never saw. The Optimiser is in Pro and Max. Both come with 30 days money back.

These are past results on historical data after the costs stated above. They don't forecast anything and they aren't advice to trade. Futures can lose more than an account holds.